Studio Recording

advice on audio interface

11 replies 2,008 views

Started by

ScalaQuaranta

Member

Member

Opening post by ScalaQuaranta

Posts
536
City
torino

hi everyone,

i need some advice:

i own a hercules 16/12 fw audio interface... a bit outdated, actually, but for what I need, it's more than enough. i've always used it with my mac. then i wanted to update the operating system (now i have OS X 10.8.2) and now the interface is no longer recognized. i've been told

that it might be a driver issue, but on the hercules website, the most recent drivers are those related to the previous OS X operating system. what should i do?

Member

Reply 2 by ScalaQuaranta

Posts
536
City
torino

in the worst case scenario, if I were forced to buy another one, would you recommend any models?

keep in mind that I don't do high-level home recording, nor would I be capable of it or interested in doing so.

i use it for simple home recordings, at most to record rehearsals with my jazz quartet,

and for the ensemble of instruments that I had my students at school build. I don't know much about it, but it seems
to me that I have listed 3 different situations. therefore, I believe I need an interface with a good number of inputs.

otherwise, I really wouldn't know where to start!

Administrator

Reply 3 by Thesimon

Posts
4,504
City
Ariccia, RM

You can't do anything, no drivers no party...

How do you record your Jazz quartet? What is the recording set?

Member

Reply 4 by Zedef

Posts
315
City
.

In the absence of drivers, I would try to resolve it by making a double partition: one with Snow Leopard and one with Lion/Mountain Lion, and I would use the Hercules under 10.6.8, or obviously change the card.

As for me, as long as everything works, I'm staying with Snow.

Member

Reply 5 by Zedef

Posts
315
City
.

If it's new, I wouldn't go for a FW: little by little it is going out of use.

If 8 inputs are enough for you: http://www.thomann.de/it/maudio_fast_track_ultra_8r.htm ; http://www.thomann.de/it/presonus_audiobox_1818vsl.htm ; http://www.thomann.de/it/tascam_us2000.htm

If you need more, the price goes up quite a bit.

http://www.thomann.de/it/maudio_fast_track_ultra_8r.htmhttp://www.thomann.de/it/presonus_audiobox_1818vsl.htmhttp://www.thomann.de/it/tascam_us2000.htm

Member

Reply 6 by ScalaQuaranta

Posts
536
City
torino

hi simone: you fly too high!!!! i record my quartet's rehearsals veeeery amateurishly, just to have a little help

at home for studying, to understand what things we do well, what less well, the sound, the improvisations....4 microphones placed in a cross

and off we go... they say it's like a cult in the 'ndo cojo cojo style! ;-P

hi zedef: not bad your proposal!!! extreme remedies for extreme evils!!!

Administrator

Reply 7 by Thesimon

Posts
4,504
City
Ariccia, RM
Zedef wrote:

As long as everything works, I'm staying with Snow.

Same here! I tried Lion right when it came out and it gave me a lot of compatibility problems, many even with Logic, and I went back immediately. It is also true that it had just come out, but as Zedef says, as long as everything works for me, I'm staying with Snow Leopard too.

Member

Reply 10 by Zedef

Posts
315
City
.

Rather than the H2, an H4n is better since you can use 2 external microphones + the 2 from the zoom.

However, it is almost impossible to work in multitrack unless you record one instrument at a time.

And anyway, an H4n costs 250-300 euros; at this point, an 8-channel interface is better.

Member

Reply 11 by pasquale

Posts
55
City
Prato

I also stick with Snow for home recording. Pro Tools crashes on me constantly and I have no intention of following Mode.

If there were a version for Windows, I would go with 7. On the same machine, it runs much faster

Administrator

Reply 12 by Thesimon

Posts
4,504
City
Ariccia, RM

Logic no because it is Apple proprietary but Protools is also available for windows 7 !

Log in to participate