...bestie

It seems to me that the title is quite explanatory of the phenomenon.

Each of us has our own sexual life as a couple and our own "sexual quirks". There are those who take photos of themselves, those who make videos, those who use erotic toys... I don't consider myself one of those who applies taboos at a couple level, because just as boys like certain things, so do girls, and just as men have their sexual fantasies, women have them in the same way. But publicly disseminating photos of one's own woman showing her nudity in private, perhaps to please her partner, not knowing what

as for me, it seems that Frank's title is unfair (I say this as an animal lover)

I have no words.

Even though I consider myself, as a person, to be at the opposite poles of such . . . . . . when I read/hear things like these, I feel ashamed in front of all women.

in fact, in my opinion, the problem is not within the sexual sphere itself.

everyone has their own sexuality....but the profound lack of respect for one's partner in the hypocrisy of a fake intimacy and superficial feelings is decidedly worrying. In this way, all couple values are betrayed.

but what I see as very dangerous and in evident negative evolution is the fact that current society, with various social networks, offers aggregative possibilities to these forms of dysthymia that did not exist before. It is easy to create a "pack" and "normalize" certain dysfunctional emotional attitudes by reinforcing them....thus, the subject in whom sexual bullying/aggression used to be submerged and perceived as anomalous by themselves is reinforced through sharing with other dysthymics.

As Luca says, calling these subjects beasts is offending real animals. Everyone is free to live their own sexuality as they best believe, on this we all agree, but if you use the other person without their knowledge as a bargaining chip, you are a scoundrel.

Today I am calm. Is it a flamethrower? The ugliness is boundless

Being sick is serious.. but it is a logical effect in the journey of this society.

The problem is deep and one of thought. Unfortunately, people have manipulated cultural and spiritual references, and this is a big problem.

As you were saying, Simone, in another post regarding talk shows... appearing and standing out from the crowd to say... I am different from you.. I am better, more... more and blah blah blah... and here in the sexual sphere we witness the same phenomenon... protagonism... making oneself noticed in any way because these people have no other ways to emerge from the nothingness into which they have fallen.

And to think that artists of the past died in misery without even being worthy of recognition... yet, despite this, perhaps out of faith, perhaps out of stubbornness, but anyway out of love towards people, art, or the very nature of things, they continued their work in silence. These are and will be the immortals.. those who express themselves for others, to leave them a gift, a trace from which they can begin to hope again.

These people are trash.. perhaps they don't even deserve to be spoken about.

LucaCavaliere wrote:

as for me, it seems that Frank's title is unfair (I say this as an animal lover)

I have no words.

Even though I consider myself, as a person, to be at the opposite poles of such . . . . . . when I read/hear things like these, I feel ashamed in front of all women.

You are right Luca, from an animal lover's perspective it is an insult to animals to compare them to these "human" beings.

I had thought about the title quite a bit, in the sense that I find the word Animal more noble than Beast... just pour parler

a-ni-mal, from Latin: animal derived from anima soul, related to Greek: anemos wind, breath and to Sanskrit ātman with the same meaning.
https://unaparolaalgiorno.it/significato/A/animale

Therefore akin to man in the idea of the soul

b-east, from Latin: bestia brute, wild animal; in particular, a specific term that indicated animals destined for combat in the circus.
https://unaparolaalgiorno.it/significato/B/bestia

In effect, even Beast is not suitable, indeed, from certain points of view, it tells of "victims"

As far as I'm concerned, I have already forgiven you

Frank wrote:

In fact, even Bestia is not suitable; in fact, from certain points of view, it tells the story of "victims"

Yes Frank. I agree with what you are saying.

Regardless of the anger these things arouse in me, what disturbs me is the question:

how does one come to build - day after day - such an ignoble human being???

Now I will write something that I know could outrage many men.

I think that "rape on Facebook" is just the latest manifestation of what is generally male nature. And by nature, I mean Nature exactly as it made us.

Let us never forget one basic thing; we are an integral part of the animal world and therefore beasts in every respect, with one difference: we have reason.

However, reason does not erase instinct, which guides the entire animal world, and when the culture of millennia of homo sapiens fails to dominate, all the instinctive beast within us comes out.

Rape against females is a gesture that has accompanied us since the dawn of our appearance and manifests en masse especially in moments when man becomes a warrior—in short, when he makes war and shows his most horrible side.

Facebook or the internet in general can also, unfortunately, create this: the possibility of committing mass rape against females.

And in this view, one also finds the very sad explanation for why there are so many femicides committed by men.

"Let emotion correct the rule," said Braque, Picasso's friend.

Let reason triumph over instinct, leaving instinct only its best perceptions."

Here are the "fruits" of certain contexts ... cyberbullying

http://www.huffingtonpost.it/2017/02/03/diffondono-sua-foto-hard-in-rete-vendetta-genitori_n_14591030.html?ncid=fcbklnkithpmg00000001