As many will know, this year marks the centenary of Benjamin Britten's birth; I am setting up this space to remember him and to report any initiatives on the subject.
To me, he has always seemed like a somewhat mistreated composer, but one with great value.
T
Tiger
Member
Reply 2 by Tiger
Posts
447
Valchiria wrote:
To me, he has always seemed like a somewhat mistreated composer but with great value.
Another victim of Darmstadt
C
Carlos
Member
Reply 3 by Carlos
Posts
759
I agree. Britten is an author who should undoubtedly be known more. In this regard, I propose a piece that I personally adore. It is «Les Illuminations» op. 18, for high voice and string orchestra, on texts by Arthur Rimbaud. Here is a live version from 1966, sung by Peter Pears and conducted by Colin Davis.
fortunately it has always been a public success (at least that). And it practically created the English operatic production system, which is no small feat.
And here is one of my favorite pieces, Queen Elizabeth I's soliloquy and prayer from "Gloriana", a little-known opera by Britten. Simple and immediate.
nothing famous. I have never listened to anything of his for piano, for the occasion I searched for this nocturne "Night-Piece" which should be his most famous composition for piano
Peace to the soul of our friend Nono, I would like to propose this listening
Britten String Quartet No. 3, Op. 94: I. Duets: With moderate movement
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR00rQDB6Sk
Tiger wrote:
Another victim of Darmstadt
It seems evident to me that Britten is a musician who was not insensitive to the avant-garde, as everyone in the 20th century dedicated themselves to interrupting the narrative course. A process that clearly began with Webern and was radicalized by the composers who followed.
Britten does this, despite a language strongly tied to tonality, through suspension ... he even manages to use a total chromatic in this piece by means of a dodecaphonic series. The interesting thing is that he doesn't even develop it afterwards.
From my point of view, his is nonetheless a modern language and can/must be a reference for those who would still like to express themselves in a more traditional context.
He even ventured into some jazz worlds, although I find this piece a bit boring (I wouldn't say useless) ... it often happens with those classical composers who vaguely refer to jazz... except for only a few exceptions (see Gershwin and the Shostakovich/Kubrick waltz)