Composition

Cultural avant-gardes are almost all stupid

3 replies 1,959 views

Started by

Shark

Member

Member

Opening post by Shark

Posts
106

Cultural avant-gardes are almost all stupid

http://megachip.globalist.it/democrazia-nella-comunicazione/articolo/2013638/le-avanguardie-culturali-sono-quasi-tutte-stupide-non-casciateci.html

Almost all, not all

True artists, born in the avant-gardes and their surroundings, have not been lacking: from Boccioni to Carrà and Palazzeschi, to Picasso, Schoenberg, Stravinsky, Mayakovsky, Buñuel… They are easy to recognize: they do not renounce technique; on the contrary, they develop it, they rethink it to grasp more meanings, not to abolish them.

http://megachip.globalist.it/democrazia-nella-comunicazione/articolo/2013638/le-avanguardie-culturali-sono-quasi-tutte-stupide-non-cascateci.html

Member

Reply 3 by Eagle

Posts
264
micamahler wrote:

The first comment is the best

The difficult part is classifying them correctly within their contemporaneity

Member

Reply 4 by maquieto

Posts
665
City
Massa Carrara

It doesn't make a wrinkle, I would say. The problem is that...
"Being unable to judge anyone anymore due to the modern respect for the individual and their expressions, no one will be judged and therefore..." The entire system of judgment collapses... to put it briefly, regarding who does something well and who does it poorly.

Technique, in my opinion, serves as a universal law; as I always say "Would you have yourselves judged by a judge who cannot refer to a common law and stability shared by all?"

And it's an old story by now; the new does not consist in "doing new things" but in "looking with new eyes" at those who have nothing to say and should remain silent or rather... change professions, but... unfortunately, that is not the case.

A vast topic, I would say, but very interesting.

Log in to participate