Video

Debussy Clair de Lune with new setup

4 replies 977 views

Started by

foster12

Member

Member

Opening post by foster12

Posts
376
City
Milano

Good morning everyone, I wanted to share this recording with this new microphone after having adjusted the piano a bit after the winter. It seems to me that beyond the amateurish recording, the sound is more pleasant than my previous ones.

Comments are absolutely welcome regarding both the performance of the piece, the sound quality, and the type of tuning/intonation I have tried to achieve.

Thank you all.

https://youtu.be/X3IwVwjca98?si=oO4-FXLalcYf16It

Administrator

Reply 2 by Thesimon

Posts
4,504
City
Ariccia, RM

Hi Enrico. It's good to see you here again...

Thank you for sharing your recording of Debussy's Clair de lune, which is a piece that reminds me of many things because I won a piano competition with it as a child.

From the very first measures, it is evident that you have solid technical control: the arpeggio flows cleanly, the attacks are sharp, and the reading remains orderly from beginning to end. With Debussy, I tend not to overdo the rubato too much, but these are stylistic choices.

The pedal, on an upright like yours, is always a minefield: just half a second too long and the sound becomes muddy. You use it with prudence, leaving the voices legible even in the middle passages where you go quite low into the left-hand bass notes that risk muddying everything. If you wanted to try a touch of Impressionist magic, you could try even more frequent micro-changes: very rapid half-pedaling that makes the harmonics vibrate without creating an indistinct cloud.

The melody, especially in the mid-high registers, emerges very clearly; again in the bass, where the upright does not offer the same depth as a grand piano, a slight relaxation of weight in the hand could make the upper line sing even more, restoring that "lunar glow" that emerges, for example, in Michelangeli.

In the title, it says you used an NT4 for the recording. I find that it captures the brilliance of the highs well and provides a sharp stereo image. Keep in mind that I am listening to it through two Genelec studio monitors, so I have excellent monitoring.

What is missing, though it is physiological on an upright, is a bit of body in the low frequencies. You could experiment with placing the microphones a few centimeters lower toward the soundboard, or add a slightly distant room mic to provide more depth of field.

The instrument seems well-prepared.

Your reading seems elegant and sincere to me, prioritizing clarity of song and coherent phrasing. The timbral palette is inevitably limited by the instrument.

Compliments on the work!

Member

Reply 3 by foster12

Posts
376
City
Milano

Thank you Simone for listening to me and dedicating some time!

Thank you for the tips. I bought two used NT5s and I wanted to try them underneath, near the soundboard. The room where the recording was made is 3x3 and is full of reverb despite the raw walls, carpet and curtains, ceiling with beams and tongue-and-groove paneling.

Administrator

Reply 4 by Thesimon

Posts
4,504
City
Ariccia, RM

Do one thing then. Just record the audio and send it to me. When I have a moment, I'll fix it up for you and send it back... Send me the uncompressed WAV format via WeTransfer to the email info@simonerenzi.com

Member

Reply 5 by AJPiano

Posts
18

Good morning... compliments on the effort in the setup.

In my opinion, the sound is clean regardless, but on an upright piano it's hard to manage room reverbs :) Perhaps by slightly moving the microphones you could resolve it...

Log in to participate