Harmony and counterpoint

doubts about music theory books

24 replies 4,318 views

Started by

Fox

Member

Member

Reply 21 by Tiger

Posts
447

In effect it is not a fraction, no one notices a fraction in a score. In "spoken" and non-scholarly language, 4/4 is indicated to be understood... but as for the symbols, you can take them from Font Maestro on the computer and write all the metric indications you desire

Member

Reply 22 by DrJellyfish

Posts
576
City
Par Bastet
Fox wrote:

Hi, thanks for the answer

4/4 is not a fraction but just a time indication, that's how I studied it.. then they call it a metric fraction, but it's not right (so teachers say)

Member

Reply 24 by DrJellyfish

Posts
576
City
Par Bastet
Tiger wrote:

In fact, it is not a fraction; no one notices a fraction in a score. In "spoken" and non-scholarly language, 4/4 is indicated to be understood... but as for the symbols, you can get them from Font Maestro on the computer and write all the metric indications you desire

What I mean is that if you speak of 4/4, you are still expressing a metric indication in the form of a fraction, and it is not just a graphic matter because, even if you change the fonts, the meaning of the symbol will always be to represent the capacity of a measure expressed with a number that divides it into a total number of parts (i.e., fractions).

Member

Reply 25 by Fox

Posts
170
City
Italia

Yes, in the end even this makes sense to me, it's just that they caused me a bit of confusion by telling me "it is called a fraction but in reality it isn't".

Anyway, thanks everyone!

Log in to participate