Electroacoustics-Explanation of a loudspeaker's frequency response

Practically it is a curve; if you post the definition from the book... let's try to derive it.

If you are referring to the +/- 3db ...it means the attenuation at the frequency range extremes.

Pietrosky wrote:

On 1/3/2019 at 18:01, Pietrosky said:

Hello everyone, I wanted to know the definition of speaker frequency response because I don't quite understand the explanation in the book.

Thank you for any answers.

A loudspeaker receives an input signal. Suppose we insert a signal that contains all frequencies with the same amplitude; how are these reproduced by the loudspeaker? There are physical limits to sound reproduction by loudspeakers. For example, small cones cannot go very low in frequency, which means that the frequency response at low frequencies will not be consistent with the signal sent as input. The ideal loudspeaker is one that, when sending an input signal with constant amplitude for all frequencies, reproduces a totally linear frequency response at the output, comparable to the input signal given the same amplification factor.

thesimon wrote:

On 5/3/2019 at 18:02, thesimon said:

A speaker receives an input signal. Suppose we insert a signal that contains all frequencies with the same amplitude, how are these reproduced by the speaker? There are physical limits to sound reproduction by speakers. For example, small cones cannot go very low in frequency, which means that the frequency response on low frequencies will not be consistent with the signal sent as input. The ideal speaker is one that, when sending an input signal with constant amplitude for all frequencies, reproduces an output frequency response that is totally linear and comparable to the input signal given the same amplification factor.

BackSpace wrote:

On 4/3/2019 at 21:36, BackSpace said:

Practically it is a curve; if you post the definition from the book... let's try to derive it.

If you are referring to +/- 3db ...it means the attenuation at the extremes of the range.

Thank you all for the answers. thesimon's explanation was very exhaustive.