If (I don't want to call it art because it remains a bit difficult for me, it is practically the same thing I said about music regarding the use of the term artist) the "concept" that one wants to
express, precisely through "conceptual movement," is alternative; that is, it reflects both the reality of what is taken as a starting point, as an object, or as a message, and also its own point of view which can also be the point of view of many, only that whoever looks, whoever listens, probably hadn't thought of such a conception. One could speak of something that is proposable, but the risk, as you have already anticipated, is resorting to these methods to pass oneself off as creative or alternative.
The problem is also something else: if I take a drum kit, and for how I conceive it I see something completely different from the image in front of me, I must find a convincing way to support
my position, and I think this can occur if two simultaneous factors are present: the spontaneity of thought that leads to "visions" detached from what the object under
examination seems to be, and at the same time a rational and almost "disorienting" explanation of the perception one has of this object.
Everyone, or almost everyone, can think they can "see" something that goes beyond the image presented before them, but precisely the difficulty lies in convincing others of this, because the balance
between fantasy and the relationship with reality is unstable.
