Watch this video carefully and ask yourselves why Monti was appointed senator for life 4 days before Berlusconi was brought down. Monti serves the interests of the banks that wanted the euro, and Berlusconi has always served his own. The PD is almost entirely a finished party without ideas. The Lega can be explained away with a burp and the UDC goes wherever the political appointments go. The only ones saying anything concrete are the Five Star Movement and the IDV.
It is not possible that only these two have content! Everyone should have it, but in reality, almost nothing matters to most Italians in parliament.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucme25Fx34c
Pass it on and share as much as you can!
I forgot: go see when Napolitano appointed Monti senator for life: 9/11/2011. Entered government 16/11/2011.
Well alright, sure, all true, but you know what's new...
Perhaps for you, since you stay informed through various means, it will be obvious. However, my point is aimed at telling or reminding those who don't know. For example, I tell my parents, who don't know much about politics or PCs, and I try to explain the situation to them, and this video seemed very clear to me.
The problem, in my opinion, is that those who don't know do so because they don't want to know, in the sense that they simply don't care at all; France or Spain, as long as they get to eat. Today, anyone who wants to know can do so. And probably, if they haven't, it's because their parents and grandparents were also uninterested. The P2 and the empire of banks certainly didn't start with Monti; that is just the final passing of the torch... in a soft version.
I want to clarify that I am not campaigning for anyone. I have only expressed an opinion.
Regarding Grillo and his movement, I also have doubts, but they are the only ones in whom I see a possibility of change. This topic is solely aimed at sharing a thought I have.
I might agree, if it weren't for the fact that Grillo tends to believe all the worst hoaxes circulating online, and this does not exactly speak in favor of his intelligence. Then, whether they are at least alternatives is another matter.
I might agree, if it weren't for the fact that Grillo tends to believe all the worst hoaxes circulating online, and this does not exactly bode well for his intelligence. Then, whether they are at least alternatives is another matter.
What hoaxes? Grillo, with all his limitations, nevertheless denounced the Argentine bonds, the Parmalat case, and Cragnotti's Cirio in his time. If you read his blog or watch some of his videos and do your research, you will discover many, many interesting little things.
It's not that Grillo was needed to discover them, but he has always been an inconvenient figure and for years he was banned from TV. I would prefer to watch a Grillo show than the little puppet theater of various politicians speaking in politicalese.
True, but besides that he also believed in: air-powered cars (hoax), biowashballs (hoax), seigniorage (mega-hoax)... He's just missing HAARP and chemtrails. I much preferred him as a comedian.
Well, I'm fine with Biowashball, as well as the compressed air machine; there is a ton of nonsense going around, but seigniorage, as far as I know, is not a hoax at all. It would be a hoax if Banks were nationalized in their respective countries having a centralized system instead of a decentralized one with Joint-Stock Companies having legal headquarters in tax havens. Printing 100 cinema tickets with 'entry: ā¬10' written on them, giving them to the cinema owner who sells them in the evening, and then showing up the next day to the same owner and asking for the printing of the 100 tickets (ā¬10 x 100) + n% is, in my opinion, not normal. This means giving value to money out of nothing, which I am fine with if it is done by the state (which once circulated as much money as the value of the gold reserve), but I am not fine with it if it has to be done by a S.p.A. [Joint-Stock Company]. This is how I had read about banking seigniorage. If there is any economics expert out there, please step forward; perhaps you will be able to explain it better. Honestly, it's not a subject I have researched much, also because it is very difficult ground, so I might have said some nonsense; I wrote it as I read it and as I remember it (limited to one article); the economy has changed a lot and a dense network has formed between countries with government bonds, publicly traded companies, so it's not easy to talk about these things for those who are not professionals. It would take an economics graduate who wrote a thesis on banks and money disbursement methods.
Regarding Grillo, I also think that on some things he is perhaps a bit too extremist, but he has certainly changed since the times when he passed off Biowashball as the miracle of the century; but I still remember when he spoke ill of the internet and computing, whereas today he adores it, partly because it was the medium that allowed him to grow so much. In my opinion, changing one's mind about things is not a sign of weakness or stupidity; quite the contrary, it is much harder to admit you are wrong and change your mind. I believe it is typical of intelligent people to question themselves. Today's Grillo compared to the one from 12 years ago seems more inclined to consult renowned experts when discussions arise in which he cannot express an objective opinion. See, for example, the carcinogenic nanoparticles detected by two scientists with an environmental scanning microscope. Or the accusations launched against companies like Parmalat long before their secrets were uncovered. For those in that circle, these are things that are already in the air; then, of course, one must distinguish what is true from what is false.
Honestly, I am thinking very seriously about who to vote for. We aren't running an election campaign here, of course not, but it is still a section called "Thoughts and words in freedom"; everyone says their piece, we aren't going to go around fighting over politics!
