Teaching

Music education in our country is intermittent and obsolete.

7 replies 2,570 views

Started by

JazzMania

Member

Member

Opening post by JazzMania

Posts
116

I completely agree with what was written by Caleb Chapman - current President of JEN, Jazz Education Network - regarding music education.
We can all do more!

I am copying a quick translation by Angelo Valori:

Music education in our country is intermittent and obsolete.

This is the bad news. The good news is that we have thousands of dedicated and passionate educators in our schools, and access to cutting-edge technology that most of us never dreamed possible 15 years ago.
We are particularly spoiled in Utah with some of the best educators in the nation, as demonstrated by the consistent quality of our public school ensembles, including groups, orchestras, jazz ensembles, choirs, and concert bands.

While there are fortunately some exceptions, one usually feels as if there is a great missed opportunity for us, as educators, to connect with our communities through music that resonates. The audience for student performances is often minimal and limited, with parents having to attend.

Let's imagine a different scenario for a moment.

Wouldn't it be wonderful if every child had access to a music education that inspired and motivated them? That connected them to their essence? That allowed them to express themselves with the uniqueness of their own voice?

Wouldn't it be wonderful if specific music were taught because it can achieve the greatest change in the student? That we didn't just teach pieces or styles simply because that is how it has been done for decades?

Wouldn't it be wonderful if our students' performances were full of audiences not because (people) feel obligated to be there, but because they are hungry for the joy and exaltation of the experience? That communities supported music education not out of guilt, but because they cannot bear the thought of living without it? That our young musicians felt appreciated for the countless hours of work required in practice?

Wouldn't it be wonderful if we celebrated music education because it brings happiness to the performer as well as the listener and makes our lives better in many ways, instead of trying to convince people that we do it to improve math and science scores?

All of this is possible. But if we want a different result, we must be able to accept change.

I am used to being called controversial, and that is fine. But the reality is that we have the tools and the opportunity not only to preserve music training for the next generation, but to expand it immensely!

Member

Reply 3 by pianothor

Posts
217
City
Mantova

In my opinion, in our country it is not musical education that is lacking, but the Invitation to music; simply because most people are not interested in music since no one has introduced them to it. And introducing [one] to music is veeeery difficult.

Member

Reply 4 by LucaCavaliere

Posts
860
City
Segrate
Frank wrote:

I often remember this thought by Mahatma Gandhi: "Be the change you want to see in the world"

integration (if you see it changing for the worse) ... "Be the resistance that you want to save the good that was there"

and I am thinking specifically about musical ed.

Moderator

Reply 5 by Frank

Posts
3,838
City
-
LucaCavaliere wrote:

integration (if you see it changing for the worse) ... "Be the resistance that you want to save the good that was there"

e I am thinking specifically about the musical ed.

Thank you Luca for this reflection, indeed it is not certain that changes - even if intended - are improvements. But then, improvements for whom?

Usual questions in freedom

Member

Reply 6 by LucaCavaliere

Posts
860
City
Segrate
Frank wrote:

Thank you Luca for this reflection, indeed it is not certain that changes - even if intended - are improvements. But then, improvements for whom?

Usual questions in freedom

hi Frank

as you may remember, (basic) musical Ed. is THE topic closest to my heart. And we have discussed it extensively in many discussions in the past. Without reopening the discussion, I say that pianothor's post above synthesizes much of what I think on the subject.

(schematically)

musical education presupposes, above all, listening skills

listening is a passive thing

'passivity' is no longer in fashion (today everything must be 'active' or rather 'interactive' ... and immediately)

Therefore (as pianothor says) >>> introducing music is veeeery difficult

PS in a society where a three-year-old child can afford to interrupt at will the mother talking to the grandmother without being invited to wait (and be a little quiet), it will be very hard for them to then learn to be quiet and listen for five minutes to a musical piece... or even a teacher speaking.

I am not saying it will be impossible. It will just be veeeery difficult.

Moderator

Reply 7 by thallo

Posts
1,170
City
Crema

I also spoke vaguely about it on the phone with Luca :-)

let's remember that musical abilities are COGNITIVE abilities, and they do not only concern the predisposition to listening (innate, since hearing and our system for deciphering sound signals were born for survival) but abilities such as motor coordination, spatial perception, and interaction with a group.

It is very complex, however, to tackle a serious discussion on "basic" musical education. Let's remember that listening to an entire symphony, understanding "something" about it, and talking about it should not even be part of basic musical education, but rather of an advanced level of artistic education. As they say, there are very talented pianists who are completely tone-deaf, and if playing well is part of an advanced level of musical knowledge, being in tune should be part of a basic level.

In the end, talking about "levels" is, anyway, a mystification. Or rather, talking about levels by associating them with a didactic path that follows a basic level with an intermediate level and then an advanced level. The reality is that music is such a vast field that it allows for very different points of entry, and from each of these points, all the missing levels can be "recomposed."

Member

Reply 8 by LucaCavaliere

Posts
860
City
Segrate

I stay more "down to earth" :-)

the very talented pianists who were completely out of tune in order to become very talented pianists must have wanted it, right?

how can one want to become a good pianist without loving music?

how can one love music without having listened to it?

how can one listen to music without a (even minimal) willingness to be silent within oneself to listen to it?

i insist: it is on the education of listening that one must work (not only for the benefit of music)

Then, as a side note, also regarding understanding something of an entire symphony... I don't see it being that hard.

Which entire symphony?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ALaAuK_FOo

Log in to participate