Conducting

... Regarding Coriolanus

5 replies 1,798 views

Started by

Dino

Member

Member

Opening post by Dino

Posts
277

I'm sharing this link:

Beethoven, Coriolan Op. 62, Torino Philharmonic Orchestra, Federico Maria Sardelli

Don't you think that Coriolan wanted to overdo it? Granted, it is a very well-known opera and it's difficult to say anything new, but even the ff are close to being noise.

Is it just my impression?

Member

Reply 3 by GoffredoLIguri

Posts
104

I hear several distortions, I think it depends on who made the recording, so I find it difficult to judge the ff... listen here instead...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=km5BWuolJPY

...

I tracked down this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3TE0s1CtW4

Member

Reply 4 by Dino

Posts
277
Carlos wrote:

It's bad... what do you mean...

I don't like it; aside from the recording being actually pitiful, the fortissimos are raucous and what I like least is the lack of "ferocity" in the string attacks.

... it doesn't satisfy me

Member

Reply 5 by Dino

Posts
277

...nothing to be done, I write the "è" and during the saving phase it transforms into è ... oh well"

Member

Reply 6 by Rotore

Posts
337
City
-

With all due respect, it is quite difficult to believe that the problem should be attributed to the miking. I agree with Dino; it seems to me that the timpani are being used as "war drums," and it is not due to the actually rougher (and more percussive) sound of period timpani, but rather to "pop-rock" derivations... I would say an awkward use of percussion in "ancient" contexts.

The timpano here plays a normal harmonic part; it is certainly not the rhythmic support for those accents and at that tempo, with those staccatos, it is natural that the timpanist is led to give a heavy blow to their instrument: moreover, one can almost see the conductor making the usual "rip" along with an accompanying leap on the podium.

Log in to participate