Piano technology

Regarding... repetition spring

1 reply 762 views

Started by

francescochopin90

Member

Member

Opening post by francescochopin90

Posts
355
City
.

I should preface that this is not a question, but rather a reflection for discussion.

It is said that the spring tension must guarantee the hammer a decisive movement from the let-off point to the escapement without wobbling. In an American forum, however, someone claimed that the right tension is the one that prevents bobbling during a pianissimo touch.

I believe that such adjustment is the most customizable one and does not affect other adjustments; on the contrary, it is the tension itself that depends on the pre-regulation, the regulation, and any potential friction.

The tension I prefer is the one that allows me to play, after depressing the key down to the escapement point, with a small tap—almost like a finger pizzicato—and hear a very faint sound. No more! Otherwise, the tap can be heard upon the key's return and, paradoxically, repetition becomes more difficult for me (I am not generalizing, I am speaking for myself). However, the vivacity of the hammer's return on the escapement screw is not very lively (a technician told me it should be like a clock hand). In this way, however, I feel a harder keyboard and a sound that is indeed more decisive, but less elastic. With the tension I described, it is easy for me to play on the escapement without compromising the fundamental sensation of the key or the feeling of "playing too much on the surface." Perhaps this is due to my technique or my approach to the instrument. Others speak of improved repetition with higher tension. All of this also takes into account the height of the repetition lever relative to the upright/post. With less tension (the one I described), I tend to play with very arched fingers (I previously mentioned pizzicato) and a firm, "digital" technique, whereas with higher tension, I find it spontaneous to rest my fingertips a bit more and help myself with the wrist and lateral movement of the elbows, almost as if wanting to sway and play on the surface.

What do you think? I have illustrated both technical-mechanical and technical-musical aspects.

A technical question now: are there differences when adjusting the tension from the two sides of the spring—the one going to the repetition lever and the other going to the post? On my instrument, there is a specific screw for its adjustment, so there is no need to adjust the spring directly by displacing it and using the appropriate tool.

Moderator

Reply 2 by pianoexpert

Posts
3,876
City
rocca di papa

Response: the upper part of the spring is used for loading, the lower part for unloading. It is evident that when an adjustment screw exists, one only acts on that.

Spring regulation is a delicate and personal matter. Some pianists would like very heavy springs because they think it gives them a more responsive keyboard. That is not the case. Many would want springs just sufficient to lift the hammer because they seek the pianissimo on the escapement. That is also not the case.

To have all possibilities, first of all, one must ensure that the mechanical frictions are correct and that the springs do not have to "overcome" the impediment to movement. Then, within the limits of the mechanical design, one can evaluate giving the springs the right tension... which is good for everything.

Everything you say may be right, but it is personal. Musically speaking, we must not let ourselves be "charmed" by sensations and treat them as if they were always the right path. Unless there is an impediment that prevents the "objective" execution of a piano technique formula (repeated notes, rotation, octaves, etc.), one should not tell oneself too many stories (lateral movement of the elbows... swaying and playing on the surface... etc...). Sometimes being very essential leads us on the right path. Being demanding about the preparation of our instrument: yes. But then, musically, forgetting that one is playing on a mechanism. As Denis Lavaillant says in the book "LE PIANO", we should think of our fingers as if they were touching the strings directly. The hammers as an extension of ourselves and forget everything that stands between us and the sound (i.e., all the transmission mechanism). This is why it is important for the pianist to have an efficient instrument in front of them: they must not be distracted by everything that prevents them from expressing themselves freely and "must rely on the piano instead of challenging it" (Phrase from the then Director and friend Stefan Vertes of Casa Steinway)."}

Log in to participate