Piano technology

..Regarding the Key Levers...

6 replies 1,308 views

Started by

torrese

Member

Member

Opening post by torrese

Posts
242
City
casorate sempione varese

My dear friends, pianoexpert and thesimon, I have a question for you: regarding the pivots of the white keys and those of the black keys, I noticed that they are NOT pivoted at the same distance; to explain myself, the ones for the white keys have the pivot further back than those for the chromatic keys, why is that?

THANK YOU

best regards

saverio

Administrator

Reply 2 by Thesimon

Posts
4,504
City
Ariccia, RM

My dear friends, pianoexpert and thesimon, I have a question for you: regarding the pivots of the white keys and those of the black keys, I noticed that they are NOT pivoted at the same distance. To explain myself, the ones for the white keys have the pivot further back than those for the chromatic keys; why is that? THANK YOU very much, Saverio

As you know, I am not a technician, but logic tells me it is to maintain the same key weights despite the different lever lengths, specifically: longer for white keys, shorter for black keys, but it is only a logical assumption... I am also interested in this matter; let's wait for Paolo to come and clear things up for us...

Moderator

Reply 3 by pianoexpert

Posts
3,876
City
rocca di papa

The fulcrum must be located, more or less, in the center of the key... otherwise what kind of fulcrum would it be? This regardless of the weighting. Otherwise everything would be "unbalanced".

Regards Paolo

Member

Reply 4 by torrese

Posts
242
City
casorate sempione varese

Now everything is clear to me, the chromatic keys (black) being shorter than the white ones result in being further back than these.....THANK YOU pianoexpert..

ciaooooooooooo!!

saverio

Reply 5 by Gennarino

Wow! I am very late!

I have only just read this discussion! Sorry!

Yes sir, PianoExpert and Simone are right and have explained the reason with a lot of common sense and in an intuitive way.

If intuition is not enough and you also want to understand why, let's make this small model.

Let's consider two masses with weights P1 (front part of the key) and P2 (back part of the key) located at distances L1 and L2 from a center of rotation (Fulcrum); let us also imagine that between P1 and P2 there is a rigid rod connecting them, of zero weight, which passes through the Fulcrum and is free to rotate around it.

Then, physics says that if L1 x P1 = L2 x P2, the system is in equilibrium (for example, if it is stationary, it does not rotate and remains still).

It also tells us that, for example, if L1 x P1 <= L2 x P2, then the system tends to rotate (P2 goes down, P1 goes up).

And that is what happens on the piano, except that the key stops from falling with the back part, because it finds support on the bottom part of the keyboard!

To play, I must make the front part of the key go down, making the whole mechanism move all the way to the hammers; therefore, I must manage to vary P1 and make it become P'1 so that L1 x P'1 exceeds L2 x P2, and only then does the key move.

That is why the term almost in the center, which is the center in terms of "weight".

The other important thing is that, once the key starts moving, it must have low inertia, meaning that the time between touching it and it rotating at a high enough speed to produce effects is minimal.

This is achieved by containing both weights and lengths (obviously compromises must be made, because reducing weight too much would also mean keys with little resistance, reducing length would mean little movement of the back part of the key, etc.), again in light of the previous formula, which is that of the moment of inertia.

Member

Reply 6 by torrese

Posts
242
City
casorate sempione varese

THANK YOU GENNARINO!!! for this explanation from a PHYSICIST, there is always something to learn from people like YOU.

regards

saverio

Log in to participate