Classical Music

RIP Pierre Boulez

23 replies 3,481 views

Started by

Frank

Moderator

Member

Reply 5 by Rotore

Posts
337
City
-

... I must say that many forum members have gone to great lengths to honor the death of this great composer. Well done to you who, in addition to opening topics in the "Thoughts and words in freedom" section, did not overlook this major loss.

Member

Reply 11 by Xenakis

Posts
287

Right from the beginning ("conceptual failures"), I was already fed up. There are those who haven't yet understood that Boulez, the singing company (including Messiaen) and serialism were necessary.

Member

Reply 13 by Zazza

Posts
250

So let's say it is enough even if just one person finds pleasure and intensity in approaching the authors cited by him to contradict his final thesis.

Well, let time take its course.

Member

Reply 14 by Gerardo

Posts
277

For decades, there have been texts that have seriously addressed these issues; what superficiality, this subspecies of an article.

But what exactly does this Maresca do for a living?

Member

Reply 16 by Paolone

Posts
1
City
Ancona

I hope that one does not want to believe that Lachenmann intended to support a return to tonal music. Because otherwise, it would be necessary to invite people to do something of normal common sense, which evidently the total lack of curiosity and cultural interests prevents someone from doing: listening to the music of Lachenmann himself. Here is an essay:

Lachenmann says that Darmstadt failed in educating the public to listen to a different kind of music, to enter those new worlds advocated by Stockhausen, in the fertile land of Klee and Boulez. Sixty years later, Lachenmann says, there is much tonal music in my head, and I reuse it like any other sonic stimulus around me.

Paolo

Member

Reply 17 by suonolatromba

Posts
60
City
Firenze

in my opinion, however, the author of the article is completely right.

and I challenge anyone to admit to whistling Boulez, Berio, Schoenberg, etc. etc. while in the shower or on the street.

Moderator

Reply 18 by Frank

Posts
3,838
City
-
suonolatromba wrote:

instead, in my opinion, the author of the article is completely right.

and I challenge anyone to admit to whistling Boulez, Berio, Schoenberg, etc., etc., under the shower or on the street.

... me, Berg for sure

Anyway, being able to whistle a melody is not a criterion for evaluation. It may even be that a piece does not contain a true melody, but this is insufficient for any type of evaluation. ...maybe I would worry about narrativity, which can be achieved by a melody (but not only). Then the matter would have been more serious.

Does anyone know Beethoven's Coriolan? Or Beethoven's Great Fugue?

Member

Reply 19 by Oracolo

Posts
317
suonolatromba wrote:

in my opinion, however, the author of the article is completely right.

e I challenge anyone to admit to whistling Boulez, Berio, Schoenberg, etc., etc., under the shower or on the street.

I don't know, but do you hear anything here to whistle under the shower?

Ā 

http://www.pianoconcerto.it/forum/index.php?/topic/1641-inverno-per-clarinetto-e-viola/

Member

Reply 20 by Celibidache

Posts
201

Extraordinary personality, but an unlistenable conductor regarding the classical and romantic repertoire.

Like much of his colleagues from the last fifty years.

Log in to participate