Book Review

Schoenberg Treatise on Harmony

3 replies 5,308 views

Started by

pianistamaggiorenneDi38

Member

Member

Opening post by pianistamaggiorenneDi38

Posts
113

This book opens with an impressive modesty, a dedication from Schoenberg that says something like:

'I learned this book from my students'.

Schoenberg, as many of you know, was not an academic, someone who theorized, but a composer who taught what he himself had learned throughout his great experience. I never understood his music (I have quite traditional, conformist tastes, let's say), but it didn't take me long to realize that one can still learn a ton from his books.

This treatise deviates quite a bit from other harmony books, and it is also a philosophical treatise on harmony; therefore, sometimes the long digressions Schoenberg makes can cause a bit of distraction. Aside from this, in my opinion, it is a masterpiece, period. I studied it years ago when I decided I was fed up with learning harmony and composition from popular music books, because I couldn't learn anything from them, not even from the best jazz books; sometimes I would tear them up because I understood nothing.

And not because I was stupid.... but because, in my opinion, harmony and composition can only be explained best by classical veterans.

I was tired of vague explanations, or of books where there are a million things, but where none are treated beyond superficiality.

This book was the cure.

It starts from scratch, so it is also suitable for absolute beginners (by beginners I mean beginners of classical harmony, because it is impossible to get anything from this book if you don't know how to read music), up to the chapter that evokes images of a harmonic explorer, titled 'At the Frontiers of Tonality' (at least I believe the Italian version is titled that, I studied the English version).

However, one should not think that this is a book where Schoenberg teaches his atonal technique (I have heard of many who bought this book with this expectation, which in my opinion was wrong). Schoenberg believed it was of vital importance to learn how to use well all the harmonic techniques that had already been created before, rather than jumping into atonal techniques, so to speak.

Unfortunately, I had to abandon the last third of the book, but what I learned has made an enormous difference in my music.

(As a side note, I later bought all his other books, from which I am learning a lot)

Thank you, Mr. Arnold.

Member

Reply 3 by Boesendorfer

Posts
103
City
Tirol

pianistamaggiorenneOf38, I liked what you wrote about Schönberg's Manual of Harmony.

If it is not too personal, could you explain why you stopped at two-thirds and "had to" abandon

the last part?

Too difficult?

Or did you change your life and become a monk?

Member

Reply 4 by pianistamaggiorenneDi38

Posts
113
Boesendorfer wrote:

piansitistadult38, I liked what you wrote regarding Schönberg's Manual of Harmony.

If it is not too personal, could you explain why you stopped at two-thirds and "had to" abandon

the last part?

Too difficult?

Or did you change your life and become a monk?

ah ah, no I will never become a monk, on the contrary I am not religious at all, and losing faith in God I gave myself to some orgiastic tendencies....

Keeping in mind that Schoenberg's treatise was my first serious book of harmony (that is, not those pieces of junk they make where they explain everything superficially), I stopped at two-thirds because despite remembering having tried quite hard, I began to fail to grasp certain things, so I decided to take a step back and start studying from more 'standard' books, even if always and anyway from a conservatory......

One thing I remember not understanding well is what Schoenberg means when he explains that to modulate from a major key to a minor key, or vice versa, it can be done without a transitory key, but to modulate from major to major, or from minor to minor, it is better to insert a 'passing' key that provides contrast, for example major-minor-major or minor-major-minor. If you can give me an example from classical or baroque literature (that is simple though) that uses this pattern, let me know and I will study it.

Furthermore, I didn't understand why in some technically 'correct' modulations, some notes that are reintroduced can sound bad..... so I thought of abandoning it temporarily because I don't like studying a book and moving forward while having doubts. Also because Schoenberg wrote another harmony book later anyway, which is more concise.

In reality, checking again, I only studied the book well up to a little more than halfway, although later I learned quite quickly the material that Schoenberg presents further on, such as various embellishments, appoggiaturas, etc....

Anyway, I think that as a harmony book it is more recommended to people who are not just interested in studying the ABCs of harmony, but in gaining a true intellectual culture; and everything Schoenberg wrote, even his letters, was a true education for me, especially since I never went to any music school, and anyway what I know I learned on my own (even if from books, you are always alone....)

Log in to participate