The musicology I wouldn't want

danielescarpetti wrote:

If you are referring to Giammarino, I don't think his intention is to do musicology in a few lines.

Yes, I was referring to him, because the themes he deals with seem musicological to me, and the approach taken in the articles does not seem popularizing to me.

Anyway, Giammarino aside, don't you also think that Dahlhaus's historiographical and aesthetic approach still constitutes a fundamental key to interpreting the topics being discussed?

RedScharlach wrote:

Yes, I was referring to him, because the themes he deals with seem musicological to me, and the approach taken in the articles does not seem popularizing.

Anyway, Giammarino aside, don't you also think that Dahlhaus's historiographical and aesthetic approach still constitutes a fundamental key to interpreting the topics being discussed?

oh, well on this there is no doubt, I would say. Dahlhaus is essential.