Two-Part Invention No. 3

I like it

Every now and then, some satisfaction does good, thank you.

Is it your Picicnesco?

Yes (aware that fragments will surely have already been used over the centuries, when writing is so simple it can be).

I like it too, there are a couple of points that are a bit difficult but it is a pleasure to listen to

Piccinesco wrote:

Yes (aware that certainly some fragments will have already been used over the centuries, when writing is so simple it can be).

It seems to me that, as with your other inventions, you refer back to Bachian sonorities and thoughts. However, your solutions seem anything but banal and obvious to me, especially when you lean on other tonalities. Very beautiful; I had already expressed my like without commenting, but this latest post of yours served as a springboard for me.

It is practically essential for me not to have stimuli from Bachian inventions, but (responding "at a distance" also to Frank) I often have a feeling of dishonesty towards music, because I continue (due to chronic mental fatigue, I am serious) to write without verifying the passages, modulations, etc., but basing it "only" on what I hear, which is fine because they are true sensations and emotions transposed into music, but I feel that the technical-theoretical side is missing; when I write a complete piece from every point of view, I will be more satisfied, this does not change the fact that I am pleased that it evokes positive sensations. Returning to Bach (my cross, a pleasant one), the hope would be to write pieces with greater polyphony; it would be a spectacle to realize a work like some of the preludes from The Well-Tempered Clavier.