L. V. Beethoven

"Waldstein" Sonata and Andante Favori

2 replies 2,389 views

Started by

gpr

Member

Member

Opening post by gpr

Posts
89
City
Roma

Hello everyone, especially to the admirers of the great, indeed greatest, Beethoven.

As I had the chance to write in another post (under "Composition"), lately I have been following a series of lectures held by Piero Rattalino on Beethoven's piano sonatas. Yesterday the last meeting took place, in which Rattalino expressed his opinion on the current crisis of live music and his ideas on how to overcome it; subsequently, we listened to the sonata op. 106.

At the end, there was an opportunity to ask a question. Personally, I think (as written in the other post, for those who wish to read it) that it is not worth looking for hidden "meanings" in what for me is simply music and nothing more (yesterday the maestro compared op. 106 to the story of Joan of Arc...), whereas formal issues seem much more interesting to me, because in my opinion forms are what make the music, and if one wants to help the audience understand better, certain structural issues of the pieces should also be explained to the non-expert listener, even without going into too technical details. Well, speaking of the different schemes followed by Beethoven in his piano sonatas (many in four movements, others in three, others even in two, differences which according to Rattalino are only the result of dramaturgical choices), the case of the sonata op. 53 "Waldstein" was mentioned. Many texts state without a shadow of a doubt (and I was also aware of this version) that initially the sonata was in three movements, but subsequently the author eliminated the famous Andante (which later remained without an opus number), replacing it with a short introduction (also in F major), which cannot be considered as a movement in its own right, but only as a short prelude to the rondo. Thus, a sonata in two movements. However, Rattalino maintains that this is nonsense, because according to him the Andante Favori, which unequivocally has a real conclusion, does not connect to the rondo.

Do any experts know the history of this sonata and the Andante? Is there certain proof of the fact that it was supposed to be the second movement and then Beethoven changed his mind? Or was the sonata already conceived this way?

Ciao a tutti

Gino

Member

Reply 2 by OrlandiArmando

Posts
234
City
San Biagio di Valpolcevera (Genova)

Ciao Gino! Biamonti says this:

The original manuscript is unknown. The sketches are found, together with those of the first and last movements of the Sonata op. 53, in the Eroica sketchbook. The title Andante favori, with which the piece was first designated in an 1807 edition by Breitkopf und Härtel and is still commonly known today, would derive, according to Czerny, precisely from Beethoven himself, who seems to have preferred it and played it gladly in private gatherings. According to what Ries and Czerny report, this Andante was supposed to be part of the Sonata in C major op. 53 as the second movement. A friend pointed out to Beethoven that the work would result from it being too long; an observation that, although poorly received at first, nevertheless convinced the master, after some reflection, to replace the piece with the current Introduction (Adagio molto) to the Rondo. In reality, the static and monochrome character of the Andante did not quite link with the splendid animation of the other two movements. As Rolland wrote, its main defect was not that it occupied too much space, but that it was not in place: something about which some (wrongly, in our opinion) are still not convinced today. The form is like that of the Finale of the Sonata, that of a Rondo (and even this, i.e., the succession within the same work of two somewhat long movements of the same type, would perhaps have harmed the harmony of the general structure, despite their different character). The ritornello, in whose theme D'Indy noted an analogy with an episode from the Finale of a Sonata by Rust.

That being said, I went to get the Eroica sketchbook (published by Lockwood and Gosman: Beethoven’s ‘Eroica’ Sketchbook: A Critical Edition Transcribed, edited and commentary by Lewis Lockwood and Alan Gosman. 2 vols. pp. 428 (University of Illinois Press Champaign, Ill.2013. $200. ISBN 978-0-252-03743-6.)

the sketches for op. 53 are just after those of Vestas Feuer, and consecutively cover several pages: First movement, Andante (WoO 57) and finale Rondo... I am attaching a couple of photos.... I would say yes..... Czerny and Ries (who probably knew the genesis of the sonata.... ) were right

a warm greeting,

A------------------------

IMG_4332.jpgIMG_4333.jpg

Member

Reply 3 by danielescarpetti

Posts
1,032
City
Castel San Pietro Terme

We owe the first biographical testimonies on Beethoven to Franz Gerhard Wegeler and Ferdinand Ries.

Ferdinand Ries reported the following testimony regarding Sonata Opus 53: «(...) it originally possessed a large Andante.» (Andante Favori) «A friend expressed to Beethoven the opinion that the Sonata was too long, receiving a terrible scolding for it. Upon calmer reflection (...) he soon became convinced of the validity of that observation (...)» Franz Gerhard Wegeler/Ferdinand Ries: Beethoven. Appunti biografici dal vivo. Moretti&Vitali editore) and the Andante was extracted and published separately. Regarding this piece of music, Ries also reported another anecdote: «(...) When Beethoven performed it for the first time before our friend Krumpholz and me, we liked it enormously and tormented Beethoven for so long that he had to repeat it. On the way home, passing in front of Prince Lichnowsky's residence to tell him about Beethoven's new excellent composition, I was then forced, as much as I could remember, to play said piece in his presence. Since it came back to my mind with increasing clarity, the prince insisted that I repeat it once more. It so happened that he also learned a part of it.

The following day, as a joke, the prince went to Beethoven telling him that he too had composed something, and that it was not a bad piece at all. Ignoring the fact that Beethoven resolutely told him he did not want to listen to it, the prince sat at the piano and performed, to the composer's astonishment, a good part of the Andante.

Beethoven flew into a rage (...). Never again did he allow me to be present while he played (...)» Franz Gerhard Wegeler/Ferdinand Ries: Beethoven. Appunti biografici dal vivo. Moretti&Vitali editore)

This, Gino, is the truth, but what surprises me most about all this is that Piero Rattalino now asserts this, given that he himself in his "Guida alla musica pianistica" writes: «It had originally been conceived as the second movement of Sonata Op. 53 (…) Some commentators have severely decreed that it would be a cultural duty to relocate the Andante to the place it originally occupied. But in truth, it is not understood how it could be relocated within the context of the Sonata, because the short adagio in F that follows the first movement is organically connected with the Rondo in C, and if the favored Andante is inserted, the following Andante-Largo-Rondo sequence would unbalance the architecture of the Sonata. The removal of the Andante is, in my opinion, another reason—not one of convenience, but of artistry. The favored Andante, a wonderful piece evocative of the past, with its main theme in the style of a minuet and with its ornamentations, poetically belongs to the world of the calm and dreamy Sonata Opus 54, not to that of the vitalistic, exuberant Opus 53. Beethoven is striving to reach the goal of a historical synthesis that links the contemporary era with the era preceding it. Sonata Opus 110 represents the culmination of this research, which Beethoven reaches by degrees (...) Putting together the future and the past in a single composition was, however, an immense task for which Beethoven was not yet mature (...) As a standalone piece, it gives us an image of Elysium, with the vision of the Blessed dancing ceremoniously to the time of a minuet (...)»"

Franz Gerhard Wegeler Ferdinand RiesFerdinand RiesRiesKrumpholzLichnowskyEliso
Log in to participate