Ok, but a copy-paste of what you have already stated? You know that I am always very attentive to your comments, Cla'.
a direct question, I respond:
"it seems like a good exercise to me, a study on the technique that De La Motte calls 'counterpoint with one voice'. That is, as everyone has already said, the technique used by Nyman (and a thousand others). Pleasant at times, boring from the second minute onwards. Basically, it seems long to me. If you ever want to truly use it as a cell for a soundtrack, a soundscape, or whatever you want, I would rather transform it into a loop. But I am not a composer, so it's up to you...
The title 'Acqua' [Water] is quite pretentious, in my opinion... especially since it doesn't remind me of water at all..."
posted on Edumus on December 22nd
ttw wrote:
In fact TheSimon, I think that is what Talentuoso wanted to imply... saying that someone posted a comment adds no value to the discussion; if Thallo were not a moderator, it would almost make me think of a malicious intent.
are you joking or what? I mean, I wrote "I gave my judgments on another forum", ellipsis, and I continued talking about something else. The beginning was just something en passant, but my comment ADDS value to the discussion insofar as it is not limited to those 10 words. It will add little value to the discussion, I don't know, maybe you don't feel like talking about the hundreds of soundscapes present on YouTube, but considering that I too repeated what everyone had already said in my judgments, I preferred to set the piece aside and broaden the discussion.
Do my comments always put you on high alert?! I almost lose the desire to write...
ttw wrote:
It's true, but if there is always someone evaluating the result of images+music, so in the case of autolearning... a part of the directing is handled by the composer
in essence, I don't understand what you mean. I will avoid responding to you and wait for some clarifications, because otherwise you'll come for my throat...
T
ttw
Member
Reply 22 by ttw
Posts
277
thallo wrote:
in essence I don't understand what you mean.
Maybe I didn't understand why you alluded to the absence of the director (who was supposed to call home)... anyway no problem.
T
ttw
Member
Reply 23 by ttw
Posts
277
thallo wrote:
i wrote "i miei giudizi li ho dati su un altro forum", ellipsis, and I continued talking about something else.
...sorry, I misunderstood...
N
Natan
Member
Reply 24 by Natan
Posts
239
thallo wrote:
"to me it seems like a good exercise, a study on technique that De La Motte calls 'counterpoint with one voice'. That is, as everyone has already said, the technique used by Nyman (and a thousand others). Pleasant at times, boring from the second minute onwards. Well, it seems long to me, ultimately. If you ever want to truly use it as a cell for a soundtrack, a soundscape, or whatever you want, I would rather transform it into a loop. But I am not a composer, so it's up to you...
The title 'Acqua' is quite pretentious, in my opinion... all the more so because it doesn't remind me of water at all..."
I quote, although I see nothing wrong with not inventing new syntax or language. The point is that as many of us have found, the repetitiveness is not managed in the best way; therefore, it may not yet be a good exercise; certainly, it seems to me that there is musicality that must be well-balanced. Sometimes it's a matter of courage, saying: "Ok, this piece will last 2 minutes"... because beyond that it's too much... the water will wait"
T
Tiger
Member
Reply 25 by Tiger
Posts
447
thallo wrote:
But do my comments always put you on guard?!
It doesn't seem like it to me; at most, in my opinion, the reactions show interest.
thallo wrote:
I almost lose the desire to write...
In my opinion, you would be making a big mistake. I find it normal that among 6,000,000,000 people in the world, not everyone thinks the same way... so, if there are reactions, it's because the contributions are interesting.
Closing this and sorry for the OT
T
Talentuoso
Member
Reply 26 by Talentuoso
Posts
206
Come on Thallo, I put the smiley face, it was just a way to invite you to share some opinions. You know there is love between us, we are like the devil and holy water
are you joking or what? I mean, I wrote "I gave my judgments on another forum", ellipsis, and I continued talking about something else. The beginning was just something en passant, but my comment ADDS value to the discussion insofar as it is not limited to those 10 words. It will add little value to the discussion, I don't know, maybe you don't feel like talking about the hundreds of soundscapes present on YouTube, but considering that I too repeated what everyone had already said in my judgments, I preferred to set the track aside and broaden the discussion.
Do my comments always put you on the defensive?! I almost lose the desire to write...
Calm down Clà, why do you always get so sour so quickly? I was only interested in knowing what you had written on the other forum, I didn't accuse you of malicious intent anywhere...
Among other things, if I had this fear, I wouldn't have proposed that you act as a moderator!
And let's dispel this fantasy, I say this for everyone: what is the problem if phrases said in other forums are quoted? It's a reality... Internet is vast, there are also other forums and there is space for everyone... I have never seen this competition! Users of one forum can simultaneously be users of another forum; I don't see the difficulty... What is the problem?
Another thing is SPAM. Coming to advertise another forum on this one is unfair because we pay monthly for advertising and it is not right that others use our investments to advertise their portals free of charge. You understand perfectly well that this is a different matter entirely! The reasoning seems fair, doesn't it?
