Study

Acciaccatura in Bach's 2nd English Suite

18 replies 3,475 views

Started by

ga3tan0

Member

Member

Opening post by ga3tan0

Posts
45
City
Parete

Hello, I was wondering if the execution of the acciaccatura that the book of Bach's English Suites leads me to, precisely in the allemande, is correct, as it has the function of taking away a minimum value from the main note, whereas as can be seen in the attached image it is interpreted differently... Could it be an error?

Member

Reply 3 by antares86

Posts
1,414
City
Bologna

Which edition would it be? I don't have the suites on hand right now, but I am almost certain it is an appoggiatura as marked in the resolution; it doesn't seem to me that Bach ever marked acciaccaturas, and certainly not Carl Philipp for that matter.

Member

Reply 9 by antares86

Posts
1,414
City
Bologna

Too tight, on the dotted rhythms the appoggiatura is elongated, sometimes even slightly more than the eighth note

Member

Reply 10 by antares86

Posts
1,414
City
Bologna

In any case, I don't like Pogorelich even a little bit; well, it's true that 99% of pianists don't like Bach either.

Moderator

Reply 14 by Frank

Posts
3,838
City
-

I suggest you use Henle editions; in addition to being critical in the introductory notes, you can find useful suggestions on the correct interpretation of ornaments.

Moderator

Reply 17 by pianoexpert

Posts
3,876
City
rocca di papa

beyond the fact that it is an appoggiatura, the realization is correct. On a dotted value, 2/3 of the dotted value itself is taken from the appoggiatura, otherwise it becomes an acciaccatura on the beat. The sixteenth note fa and sixteenth note mi b followed by sixteenth note si b is fine (I think the piece is in G minor?)

Log in to participate