TheSimon...I read:
Frank wrote:Liszt places it in twenty-second place (out of 32) in one of his classifications by order of difficulty (from easiest to hardest) ...preceded by the work Op. 27 no. 1 and followed by Op. 54
Started by
Member
Member
TheSimon...I read:
Frank wrote:Liszt places it in twenty-second place (out of 32) in one of his classifications by order of difficulty (from easiest to hardest) ...preceded by the work Op. 27 no. 1 and followed by Op. 54
Administrator
I hadn't read this post. Reading 109, 110 and 111 at the very end actually seemed strange to me if it were from hardest to easiest!
Moderator
gianni69 wrote:i have no curiosity
I, on the other hand, remember going to look at some fingerings and the metronome markings, which were very precise. In this specific case:
- The first beat: quarter note=50
- The second beat: dotted half note=76
- The presto agitato: 84 half note
... to be related to the pianos of that era